简介：Alongwiththeeconomicdevelopmentandtheaccelerationofurbanization,urbanconstructionlandexpandsrapidlyinChina,andhasresultedinaseriesofsocio-economicproblems.Thisarticlesummarizedthemajorpointsofcontrollingtheuncheckedandrashexpansionofconstructionlandintheacademiccircle,andanalyzedtheproblemsofregulatingtheexpansionofconstructionlandfromthreeaspects.First,thisarticleanalyzedtherelationshipsbetweensocio-economicdevelopmentandurbanizationfromthehistoricalviewpoints,andpointedoutthattheexpansionofconstructionlandisahistoricalphenomenonwhichwillbesurelyappearedinthedevelopmentofhumanrace.Second,theauthorsutilizedtwo-sectormodeltoanalyzetheimportanceofurbanizationinthesocio-economicdevelopmentfromtheacademicangles.Atlast,theauthorsutilizefour-quadrantmodelandbidrentcurvemodeltoanalyzetheinfluencethatbroughtbythestrictcontrolofconstructionlandexpansion.Throughanalysis,thisarticledrewsomeconclusions.First,theexpansionofconstructionlandisaphenomenonwhichwillsurelyappearinthesocialdevelopment.Itisimpossibletoaccomplishthenationalmodernizationonthebasisofdualisticstructurebetweenurbanandruralareas.Second,underthefunctionofrentgradientgap,strictcontrolofconstructionlandexpansionwillnotonlyobtaintheanticipatedeffects,butalsocauseaseriesofsocio-economicproblems,suchasland-levyingcontradiction,theappearanceoflimitedpropertyrighthouse,andbeingdependantonleaseinsteadofexpropriation.Third,unreasonablepoliciesandgovernmentalbehaviorsaretherootsoftheuncheckedandrashexpansionofurbanconstructionland.Basedontheseconclusions,thisarticleproposedthatthreetransformationsshouldberealizedtoregulatetheuncheckedandrashexpansionofconstructionland:transfersfromquantityregulationtoqualityregulation,fromdirectregulationtoindirectregulation,andfromsingle-measureregulationtomulti-measuresr

简介：China’slandinstitutioncanbedefinedbroadlyornarrowly.Byexaminingthebroaddefinitionofthelandinstitution,wefoundthattherewereprerequisite,complementary,andsubstitutionalrelationshipsamongthevarioussystems.Theserelationshipswereverifiedthroughdiscussionofthestructuralevolutionofeachsystem.Basedontheserelationships,threemethodsforquantificationwereusedtomeasuretheregulationintensityandintra-provincialdifferencesineachsystemamong31provinces,municipalities,andautonomousregionsinChinain2014.Thestatisticsanalysisshowsthatprovincesusedtopursueoutstandingperformancesinlandinstitutionbutfewprovincescouldoutperformtheotherprovincesinalltypesofsystems.Thestatisticsresultsalsoindicatethattheprovinceswhichexecutedlandinstitutionearlieroftenholdsignificantadvantagesininstitutionalinnovationsbutitisstillnotclearwhethertheycanmaintaintheadvantages.ThisstudyrecommendsthattheChinesegovernmentshouldimprovetheoverallframeworkofregionallandinstitutionbasedonlandsystems’relationshipsandevolutionarypatterns.Furthermore,thegovernmentshouldoptimizethespatialdistributionofregionallandinstitutionbasedontheintra-provincialdifferencesinland-regulationintensity.

简介：