摘要
摘要目的：探讨经尿道手术与开放手术治疗前列腺增生的不同临床效果，并比较两种治疗方法的安全性。方法：选取 80例前列腺增生患者作为研究对象，根据治疗方法的不同将所有患者分成观察组和对照组，观察组应用经尿道手術的方法进行治疗，对照组应用开放手术的方法进行治疗，记录两组患者的手术情况并进行生活质量评分和前列腺症状评分，同时统计并发症的发生情况。结果：经过治疗，观察组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量等指标显著少于对照组患者，观察组生活质量评分和前列腺症状评分显著优于对照组患者，观察组出现排尿困难、继发性出血等并发症的例数少于对照组，两组数据差异有统计学意义（ P<0.05）。结论：应用经尿道手术的方法治疗前列腺增生疗效优于开放手术方法，安全性更好。
关键词：经尿道手术 ;开放手术 ;前列腺增生
Objective: To explore the different clinical effects of transurethral surgery and open surgery in the treatment of BPH, and to compare the safety of the two methods. Methods: 80 cases of BPH were selected as the research object. According to the different treatment methods, all patients were divided into observation group and control group. The observation group was treated by transurethral operation, while the control group was treated by open operation. The operation conditions of the two groups were recorded and the quality of life and prostate symptom scores were made. Meanwhile, complications were counted What happened to. Results: after treatment, the operation time, hospitalization time and bleeding volume in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group. The quality of life score and prostate symptom score in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group. The number of patients in the observation group who had complications such as dysuria and secondary bleeding was less than that in the control group. The data difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Transurethral operation is better than open operation in the treatment of BPH.
出版日期
2020年04月27日（中国期刊网平台首次上网日期，不代表论文的发表时间）
